: http://www.chasy-shop.ru/cat_hm2.html

: another typo ??

Which one are you referring to? If it is the Heuer Bund, it is correct as far as the dial is concerned. If you are referring to the Leonidas it is correct in that is states only "Leonidas". But I didn't see any 1940's "Heuer Leonidas SA" which you first wanted an opinion on. To be completely truthfull with you I have never seen a correct wrist chronograph with the dial signature of "Heuer Leonidas SA". Now to qualify my statement. I collect Heuer with over 200 in my collection. Out of these, 15 are chronographs from 1930's to the 1950's. I have made a study of the movement signatures, case signatures and dial signatures. I don't have to ask anyone concerning the early Heuers if a certain one is correct or incorrect. I already know. I do have collectors asking me if I think a certain early 1930's to 1950's is correct. Charles