| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
Is an "authentic", "all original" Heuer a better watch than a Heuer with a few non original parts (for example with a replaced bezel - see previous thread)? Why?
If you think the meaning of "better" is to relative, then please provide your definition of "better" - what YOU mean by "better".
My view is that an all original Heuer is not by definition a better watch than a Heuer with a few non original parts.
Some of us may have a "museum" approach to collecting, and I understand why such a collector can have originality as a highest priority, but I also believe that many watch enthusiasts (the participants of this forum excluded) are looking for 100% originality without exactly knowing why.
Your opinion?
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |