The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

SomeThoughts...
In Response To: lemania 5100 ()

lemania 5100

Posted By: peter oldskool

Date: 3/19/06 15:55 GMT

I was just wondering what the overall opinion is about the lemnia 5100?

Hi Peter,

If you've linked around or done a Google search on the topic, you've probably run head on to my opinion on the movement. But I'm sure others will post their thoughts.

Is it generally considered the most durable chrono movement?

Oh, I don't know. I am not sure even I consider it the most durable chronograph movement. The Omega c.321 and c.861 (Lemania 2310 and 1873 respectfully) are pretty tough movements to beat. But the 5100 is probably the most durable and rugged automatic chronograph produced by anyone to date.

Is there any plastic used in its construction?

Yes, there are synthetic parts, Plastic is really a misnomer, Nylon or Delrin are more accurate ways to define the parts. Yes, Lemania used non-metalic parts in a number of places on the 5100 where they did as good or better of a job than a metal part would have done.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!!!

Dennis and SJackal included a pair of the most useful links for your learning, those being Jean-Michael's Lemania5100.net and my hosting of Watch Legends: The Calibre Lemania 5100 "Not beautiful but Rare" which includes a portal to Sergio Lorenzon's WatchScape pictorals of the Lemania 5100 and Omega c.1045 (Omega's name ffor it's version of the Lemania 5100) teardowns.

Of course and as always, please feel free to post additional queries if you have them. If I can't answer them, I'll point Pascal Straatsma to this thead. Between the two of us, we should be able to assist...

Good Hunting!

-- Chuck

Chuck Maddox

Chronographs, like most finer things in life, only improve with time...
Watch Article Index: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/cm3articles.html,
Watch Links Page: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/watch.html,
Watch Blog: http://chuckmaddoxwatch.blogspot.com/.

Non-Pasadena Pasadena Stainless 7750

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE