The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Pre-emptive post... I can't state, only opine...


Georges may I ask you a question. Posted By: SteveW62 <Steve_Waddington@yahoo.com> Date: 3/30/06 13:29 GMT In Response To:not a big year, the big year of marketing maybe (georges zaslavsky)

Hi Georges, may I pick you up on a small point in your post.

The 3612 has not been tested under rough conditions, it is a nice movement but I am not sure if it has the same level reliability of older lemania modifed Omega movements.

- How do you KNOW this ? Do you KNOW what testing has been done on the 3612 ?

I don't & would like to know where your facts are coming from.

S.

A pre-emptive post on my part...

I can't personally state that “The 3612 has not been tested under rough conditions” nor can I state that any c.33xx movement hasn't been tested under rough conditions. However, considering the failure rates of the various and sundry F. Piguet movements offered by Omega as c.33xx movements, I can opine or speculate that what testing was conducted by Omega was not especially adequate or effective in keeping the failure rate to tolerable levels or what typically occurs with other chronograph movements: such as the Rolex Daytona, Zenith El-Primero, Valjoux 7750, Lemania 5100, ETA/Dubois-Dépraz, etc.

I've had similar discussions on this point over at TZ Omega Forum, recently.

I figured I might as well post this now, because I am pretty sure my name was about to come up in this conversation..

And so it goes...

-- Chuck

Chuck Maddox

Chronographs, like most finer things in life, only improve with time...
Watch Article Index: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/cm3articles.html,
Watch Links Page: http://www.xnet.com/~cmaddox/watch.html,
Watch Blog: http://chuckmaddoxwatch.blogspot.com/.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE