![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I'm new to Omega watches (and nice timepieces in general). I'm planning on buying an Aqua Terra (black / stainless steel). However, I'm not sure which size to buy. Assuming both fit okay, can you share your thoughts on:
* The mid-size, at 36mm, seems the traditional watch size for this style of watch (e.g. same size as Rolex DateJust etc.). Is that correct or have sizes always varied?
* Is the 39mm size the standard size (as it is called in the catalog) for a Seamaster, and part of what defines the Aqua Terra as a Seamaster rather than a Deville or other style / brand?
* Or is the "standard size" of 39mm (without chronograph functions or a moving bezel) part of the current trend for big watches? Will it therefore be out of fashion in a few years?
* Does the standard size just give the watch a bit sportier look than the mid-size?
Thanks so much,
Jim
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |