![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I understand everything you say and I'm not disagreeing with any of it. I'm just trying to figure out if there is anything wrong legally about purchasing a $2k watch and claiming it as a deduction. I'm trying to see where the law states that a "tool neccessary for my volunteer work" has to be a certain price and I must not purchase one that is 100 times the cost of another one that would do the same job if not better.
It is not an ethical question, it's a legal question.
As for wether it's ethical/moral to do such thing is besides the point. With laws we're having nowadas virtue has gone out the window....
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |