![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
33x3 movement: reliable to buy? Posted By: grigoris Good evening gentlemen. It's morning here, but... =) I own the SMPC (2594.52) and I want to add to my collection another seamaster chrono. Since I don't want to buy the same style watch (ACC), I am between Bond Chrono (2225.80) and POC (2210.51). However, I found out on the net that the 33x3 movements (i.e. POC wears 3313) had some problems. Here are some links you may found useful: http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&goto=740166&rid=146 http://chronocentric.com/forums/omega/index.cgi?noframes;read=39214 Here are a couple more posts/threads for you to read over on WUS: |
|
Here is a link where Tim Houser sums up his experience with Omega the c.33xx movement and repair... Tim's story is far from the only repeat repair horror story on the c.33xx. |
|
As I said in my reply in the first portal above... My first aim was the POC but with all that complaints, I took 180 degrees turn and I am thinking of Bond chrono which uses 1164 movement, a movement which is tested for more than 10 years. Actually, the Valjoux 7750 Base movement first bowed in 1973 or 1974, so it's been around in various forms [17 Jewel early on, most versions today are 25 Jewels or more] for nearly 34 years. The SeMPC [also sometimes referred to as the "Bond Chrono", even though the only chronograph 007 has ever been shown wearing was a Rolex "Pre-"Daytona...] was watch of the year in 1994 after a 1993 introduction... So the 1164 movement has [roughly] a 14 year track record... |
|
So I'm probably not entirely impartial [but at least I do state that clearly]. The SeMPC is probably thicker than the PO Chrono but is smaller in overall size than the 45.5MM POC. You could pick up another c.33xx movement or sample the c.1164 movement. It's really your choice. Furthermore, it is that AR-coating at the outside of the crystal of the PO. I think this is a con. As long as the coating is resilient it's typically not a big deal, but if you don't care for that, [shrugs shoulders] you don't. Whats your opinion? Should I proceed with POC? The Valjoux 7750 is a movement with a far more established and better track record. It's biggest fault is that it's widely available and hence many many many manufactures use it. The c.33xx's are only used by Omega [and frankly, I think anyone else would avoid using it if they were offered it]. Any help would be really appreciated. Here is my standard advice to folks on the topic of watches:In the end your decision will be a value judgement. And the best person in the world to make a value judgement for you, IS YOU. Thanks and have a good day. I'm sure I've probably caused more questions in your mind than I've answered, but at least it's a start. Grigoris |
| ||
|
| |
|
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |