The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Titanium Planet Ocean?
In Response To: Re: Titanium Planet Ocean? ()

: A titanium PO chrono whould be the ONE watch
: that would make me consider giving up my Ti
: SeMP 2293.50. The only problem I have is
: that I am very hard on watches, and they get
: banged around a lot when I'm wearing them.

: And that brings up an interesting issue, which
: I'd like to hear other people comment on
: (and particularly georges) as far as
: durability of the 3301 movement versus the
: 2500 A/B/C, which is still 33XX based. We
: all know that there were huge reliability
: and durability issues with the A and B
: models, and the jury is still out on the C.
: At the same time, I am unaware of any big
: problems with the 3301 movement that was
: used before the coax came out, so I am not
: sure whether trading from a 3301 movement to
: a 2500C (or D, if they get there) would
: really be staying the same or trading down
: as far as durability is concerned. A Ti PO
: chrono would be very cool (and light enough
: to actually wear...), but I don't want a
: watch that is going to toes up in the middle
: of the Caribbean ocean if I bang it off one
: of the jib winches while I'm coming about.

Hi Sam,

Actually, version A was the only bad one. 2500A was scrapped from the beginning and replaced with the B version, which was used in the Aqua Terra line for nearly 3 years. 2500C came out in early 2005 and has been reliable in the Planet Ocean models so far.

Comparing the 3301 to the 2500C is an apples to oranges comparison, since one is a Piguet based chronograph movement and the other is a co-axial non-chrono based on an ETA movement. The earlier versions of caliber 3301 were more problematic. As Chuck can tell you, Omega came out with some "retrofit" parts for the 33xx series that were supposed to correct the problems once and for all. We still see reported failures in Chucks' blog, but there haven't been as many of late as there had been in earlier years.

If you've had your SMP chrono for many years now and have not had a problem, then you may simply have received a "good one". I hope it keeps on running great for you.

-John

P.S. I do think a PO in titanium would be a good idea, since the PO is a heavy watch that could use some of Ti's "lightening effects".

Messages In This Thread

Titanium Planet Ocean?
Re: Titanium Planet Ocean?
Movements
Re: Titanium Planet Ocean?
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE