The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Nope...

: I just picked up a 2531.80 SMP and I was
: wondering how many people would end up
: buying or trading up for the new co-axial
: SMP. Also I was wondering other than the
: movement what is the real big difference?

I have owned my Bond SMP 2531.80 for four years now and it has been the most accurate automatic watch I have ever owned. It has not given me the least bit of trouble in 4 years, and it hasn't even been in for service yet because it is still keeping superb time.

There was a time when I was a proponent of the co-axial, because scientifically it makes sense. However, when you consider the fact that it is attached to an ETA-based movement that still requires lubrication and regular servicing, I think Omega jumped the gun in touting that "10 years between servicings" claim. Omega knows this, since they now say every 4-6 years or every 6-8 years, depending on who you contact at Omega. So, we really don't know if the co-axial is all it's cracked up to be. Time will tell (pun intended).

Also, having seen the 2220.80 in person, I really don't like the red lettering. I think the all white lettering of the 2531.80 looks cleaner and is much easier to read on a dark blue dial.

For me, selling my 2531.80 and then paying well over $1000 more just to "upgrade" to the 2220.80 isn't worth it. I already have a watch that runs great and that I have enjoyed for 4 years, so I'm not going to give up a good thing.

Just my 2 cents...

-John

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE