The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
They may well be correct. Very similar markers to the XVI seamaster. Hands would have radium based material and certainly fit the minute index (in terms of length) correctly.
T came with the introduction of tritium and first appeared in the earlier 60s, so those hands may be kosher.
Cheers
Desmond
: These hands have a luminous strip and appear to
: be silver. Shouldn't they be gold with no
: lume? The dial just says "swiss"
: and there are no lume dots by the markers.
: TIA.
: Chris
:
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |