The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: 1958 Seamaster Timing
In Response To: 1958 Seamaster Timing ()

: Hi Everyone

: I recently bought a 1958 Seamaster with a 501
: calibre fitted. After timing it, it loses 6
: seconds a day then gains 6 seconds during
: the night when I'm not wearing it. Is that
: normal or I send it away for repair? Thanks,
: look forward to hearing from anyone.

Sounds like "positional error". A good watchmaker can reduce, but not eliminate the issue.

So, in any case, it sounds like the watch is spot on over 24 hours. Set exactly at 6am, gain 6 seconds when measured at 10pm, lose 6 seconds until the next 6am. End a 24 hour period exactly correct -- what is the worry with that?

Your 50 year old watch is keeping time just outside of COSC standards. Yes, it could be improved, but . . . if you want superaccuracy, you should try a quartz. Mechanical watches are not perfect timekeepers and never will be.

Sam

Messages In This Thread

1958 Seamaster Timing
Re: 1958 Seamaster Timing
Re: 1958 Seamaster Timing
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE