The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I'd disagree ...
In Response To: Omega History *LINK* ()


I'm afraid I can't agree with the comparison. Omega DID make their own movements. As far as I know NIKE have never made their own shoes.

As the author says Hayek came in , re-organised & basically saved Omega. One of his decisions was to "out source" the movements. Obviously at the time this was the correct decision. Omeg ais still here & as strong as ever.

Now there seem to be lots of watch "experts" out there that seem to think that this decision is wrong .....

I don't. So Omega buys it's movements in, from other firms. Who do these firms belong to ? the Swatch Group. Who does Omega belong to ? the Swatch Group.

So, maybe I'm just being synical here, but what if they just renamed one / some / all of the "movement divisions" of the swatch group to be Omega ... would everything be OK ? Would anything change ? I doubt it. Maybe the swatch group would loose a few tax advantages, maybe the swatch group would have to lay off a few people ... who knows.

I don't have a problem with Omega buying its movements from a "sister" firm. For me it's about as close as "in house" as you can get.

That's my take on it.

Steve

Messages In This Thread

Omega History *LINK*
I'd disagree ...
Re: I'd disagree ...
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE