The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Metallurgy 101
In Response To: Thanks! - No Message *NM* ()

Gold is by far the softest. The term carat refers to how many 24ths gold it contains; so, 14 carat is 14, 24ths gold. This is harder than the more valuable 18, 24ths gold.
I had some trouble finding hardnesses for titanium and stainless on the same scale which makes me suspect that titanium is softer.
As was suggested by another post, the alloy matters a great deal. Commercially pure titanium should be relative soft, whereas the widely used aerospace alloy, Ti-6Al-4V should be harder. Because the hardnesses I have seen are on the Rockwell C scale, my guess is that they are less hard than stainless.
Finally, stainless steels are divided into a groups with austenic and martensitic being common ones. Austenitic stainless steels have great corrosion resistance but are relatively soft. Common stainlesses such as 304 or 316 are austenitic. Occasionally you will hear someone say that you can't get a stainless knife to hold an edge. People who think that are thinking of austenitic stainlesses. On the other hand, martensitic stainlesses can be extremely hard. This in turn makes them hold an edge in the case of knives. I don't know whether anyone makes a watch case out of martensitic stainlesses like 440C, but my sense is that it might be a good choice.
In any case, to say that stainless is soft and scratches easily is not the whole story. I have stainless watch bands that are badly scratched and others that seem to be highly scratch resistant. There is really no reason why anyone needs to accept scratches because the manufacturer could have avoided the problem with better alloy selection.
I have seen much made of the matte vs polish finish. Interetingly my least scratched watch band has regions of matte and regions of high polish. Both are equally scratch free.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE