![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
![]() |
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | ||||||
| |||||||
|
Rich:
You raise an interesting point about the lack of criticism in the world of watch journalism.
Jack Forster recently addressed this subject, in a column that he wrote for Forbes -- The Good, The Bad, And The Inexcusable: On Writing About Watches. Jack is very effective in explaining the technical aspects of complicated watches; in this column, he provides some excellent insights into the "watch press".
Would love to have readers' thoughts on Jack's column.
Jeff
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: It's refreshing to read Ben being critical about some of the new
: watches he has reviewed of late, because my take is far too many
: watch reviewers "blow smoke up the backsides" of the
: watch manufacturers. When you look at some of the reviews, they
: are often bland and unbelievable...so congrats to Ben for some
: refreshing honesty.
: I found when reviewing and valuing cars, that it made no difference
: to most manufacturers if you were honest, but I observed others
: finding it hard to change tack after always issuing glowing
: reviews. Concerned about their next demo or perhaps worried
: about the support they receive to their advertising budget.
: No doubt this is one of the reasons Hodinkee' is doing so well.
: R
: :
: :
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |