Yeah.. I've kept out of it.. but now statements are being made about my actions that are not true.
This needs addressing....

Eddie wrote this - I presume he is talking about me...

"He took it to another forum and dissed me before I banned him, then he stole my bandwidth to further diss me"

and " ...there was no need for the aggressive rejection of my watch.. " and "I pay the bills and my rules apply"

'Dissing' - Just for the record - this is absolutely not true. Anyone can look at the postings I made here (on OTD) and can see I did not say a bad word about Eddie prior to my banning. The time stamps can be checked. (Please don't confuse anyone elses posts with mine)

'Aggressive rejection'.. again, not true.. anyone can read that thread and make their own mind up.

'My Rules' - fair enough.. but I didn't break any of the rules.

The funny thing is this... let's imagine for one second that Eddies watch is a genuine Heuer.. it would be so unbelievably rare, that it fooled all the Heuer enthusiasts, all the Heuer experts, the guys that wrote 'The History of Heuer', the head of watchmaking at Heuer at the time, and even Jack Heuer himself... this would be extremely rare.. yet the guy that it came from had two of them, NOS/mint too... seriously, I'm LMAO.

Who would you believe.. Jack Heuer & Chief Heuer Watchmaker at the time -or- Eddies mate's mate who happened to have 2 of them? ;0)
Perhaps Eddie would be willing to send it to the Vintage Dept. at TAG Heuer in LCDF for verification? Thought not.

Like someone on DWC said.. easy for the owner of a forum to do/say what he wants for his own outcome.

PS. At least @Tomhanx can see the truth

Stewart
- Heuerville