The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Unsigned clasp and crown - Both correct
In Response To: Re: Yes + another pic ()

: Fabrizio - thanks for your kind comments. This one is NOS with box
: and papers and yes, unsigned clasp. Does that sound correct?
: regards
: Paul

It really looks NOS indeed, though technically it is no longer such if it's 'on your wrist today', is it ;-P?
As for the clasp yes it is correct: unsigned clasp (unlike its cousin 510.501 that had the same bracelet with signed clasp with security closure), unsigned crown.
I renew my compliments.
Cheers,
Fabrizio

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE