I would like to hear other peoples' views about how does the dial condition affect values in dashboard and wrist watches. I notice that some posts here place great enthusiasm
on pieces with dials in worn condition.

From what I read OTD, it appears that condition of the dial is number one priority when valuing dashclocks and timers. But on wrist watches patina, even outright wear of the dial, is often appreciated. I am not referring to either types which had a famous owner or has gone through a particular feat of endurance, but normal 'tool watches' of either type.

I thought it might have been that dashclocks are still used more for use in competition as in a collection, hence needed for their readability, but surely readability applies equally to a 'tool' wristwatch. In the couple of RallyMasters I have sold it seems some buyers seek 'patina' to match their perception of their car, whereas others want 'mint' dials for their cars, as a demonstration of the condition of a piece.

For myself, I would never reject a dashclock out of hand, just because it has a worn dial. Or is it that replacement dials are more freely available nowadays?