The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003.
OnTheDash Home What's New! Price Guide Chronographs Dash Mounted Collection
Re: Accepted. So what about that dial from Antiquorum?
In Response To: Accepted. So what about that dial from Antiquorum? ()

Jeff said:
"2913 and 2923 are "part numbers", so that the factory knew
: which case-back belonged with the Valjoux 72 (thinner) and which
: belonged with the Valjoux 72C (thicker). [We see the same thing
: in the early 1960s, with some case-backs (interior) marked 92
: and others marked 72, as these movements also had different
: thicknesses.] "

that also makes no sense, why they didnt market it "72" and "72C" as the 1960s "72" and "92" for the Valjoux 72 and Valjoux 92, why "2913" and "2823" ??????

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE