![]() |
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Firstly, It's good to see you here Fr. John. welcome ! BTW it may be pure coincidence, but I find the movements are well arranged. I prefer the 321 left then the 861, then the 1863 & finally the 1861... a great array of movements :-)
I have quite a few watches, both Automatic & Manual wind. I don't keep any of my watches regularly wound. I tend to pick a watch at the beginning of the week, I set the time & either wind or shake it gently for a while, then put it on.
A week later I repeat the excercise for the next watch.
There is an argument for keeping watches wound in order to keep the oils "moving", so that they don't harden or "evaporate". I'm not sure that this is so neccessary nowadays.
I think it's more of a personal choice. After all when you look in the local watchmakers window, how many of the watches are running & showing the correct time ?
S.
Hi Guys,
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |