The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Decision - 3573.50 or 3552.59?

: John, you make a great point. To be honest, I
: wasn't even aware that there were 'issues'
: with the movement in the Racing.

Omega's 33xx series has been plagued with chronograph malfunction issues since its inception. Granted, there have been fewer complaints recently, but there have still been complaints nevertheless. The movement is a Piguet-based column wheel chronograph movement that is very intricate, and thus, more expensive to produce. That's why most models equipped with a 33xx movement are $4000+.

In the interest of full disclosure, I did buy a Broad Arrow last year equipped with one of these movements. However, the only reason I took a chance was because I love the look of the watch, and given that I bought it "like new in the box" (never worn with all boxes and papers) for only $1900, I couldn't pass up the deal. However, I would never have taken a gamble on a 33xx series movement on a new one with a price tag near $5K. Mine hasn't given me any problems (knock on wood), but there are a lot of people who have had problems and Omega has been very slow to address and correct the problems.

: I agree that the Speedy Pro is more of a
: classic. I just happened to see the Racing
: alongside the Speedy Pro in the jeweler's
: case yesterday and had never seen it in
: person. It's quite an awesome dial.

I agree that the dial is very unique, but I tend to prefer more "conservative" looks, so I personally find it a bit too busy. Only my opinion, though.

: But the more I think about it, I think the
: Speedy Pro 'talks' to me more. The price
: difference is quite a bit between the two.
: In my mind, I want to be sure that the piece
: I get won't leave me one day yearning for
: the other!

I'm yearning for the sapphire sandwich right now!! There's no doubt in my mind that you could wear that watch the rest of your life and it would still look like the classic that it is. Some watches just have that timelessness about them. For me, it's my Bond Seamaster. I can honestly say that it's the only watch in my current collection that I could never do without. I can see myself wearing it as an old man and it still looking good on my wrist.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE