The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!

Hello everyone. This thread seems to have evoked a little emotion and off topic comments, both good and bad. Firstly I am sorry that the CoAx gave you the experience you write about. I am posting to support what I have learned from experience. I owned a Rolex Datejust, 18KT/Stainless Jubiless bracelet. It went in for warranty service in the first year - autowind gave up the ghost. I came back and ran three minutes slow a month - right after a service and timing. I wore that watch daily for the next six years. When I grew tired of people asking if it was fake or real - that Jubilee bracelet was so stretched is was hard to believe. Additionally when I applauded at a sports event, the clasp would release each time. Anyway - not bashing Rolex, but stating some facts of long term ownership. I owned a number of Wittnauer's and Seiko's and somehow never felt they had a soul, and the design never brought emotion. Then I found Omega. Own a GMT, Seamaster in TI, and my pride and joy, a 1956 Melbourne Olympic Broad Arrow - black face. My wife wears my 3 year old Breitling Aerospace Chronometre everyday and I also bought a brand new Breitling Avenger Seawolf, for rugged times. I have never experienced an issued with any of these watches. The BA sees the most wrist time, behind the Seawolf. From a standpoint of bracelets - Omega first - Breitling second - Rolex a distant third. When anything is produced enmass (or not) failures will be experienced, except in the case of the infamous Slinky, where over 70 million have been sold, with no failures to date. Anyhow, this forum does see its fair share of problems posted. As someone pointed out, the web shrinks the world. But check out a Nikon forum - if you want to review failures.... My vote for value, finishing, exclusivity and soul = Omega. Through all the compliments and wrist trading at parties, I have never heard "Is that a real Omega/Breilting"...thanks for listening.

Messages In This Thread

Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
I always have to question the logic
Re: Co-axial technology, a bad coice after all!
Some comments
The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
I can't agree with this statement
Re: I can't agree with this statement
As do all other brands
ADMIN! OK Guys. it's time for me to step in :-(
Re: The Co-Axial Is Fine...
You're A Troll....
coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine
Re: coaxial is too new to be judged as fully fine
Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.3313
more thoughts and agreements
Thoughts, some agreements and disagreements...
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.
Re: Doubt the Co-Ax to blame, it's probably the c.
I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex was
Re: I guess experiences differ as mine with Rolex
Thanks Tim, honestly
Re: Thanks Tim, honestly
Thanks tim, good to see others with
No Problem
Hey Tim, sounds like we are on the same page
Absolutely
Agree
Service after sale comment
the price of the rolex and co-axial
I guess it is all subjective but personally
Re: the price of the rolex and co-axial
And another comment (A little long)
I agree with this 100% Cajun
I agree Cajun, possibly if
some thoughts
As usual Georges I will have to disagree
Re: As usual Georges I will have to disagree
And we continue to disagree....
Re: And we continue to disagree....
and again
It means to direct, concise and to the point...
chuck is right at 100%
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE