The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

My .2c
In Response To: Whats the problem? ()

I can well sympathize, my Rolex Submariner has developed two manufacturer faults within the six months I've owned it (and it has suffered no rough wear) I'd have to agree with the comment that people often buy a Rolex for the status symbol of having one (I bought mine as I'm a Bond fan) My fiance treated me to an Omega Planet Ocean for Christmas (my Submariner is still being fixed) and I can honestly say it is a far superior watch. It's easier to read, the case and bracelet are better engineered, and it keeps better time.
Omegas are available with quartz movements, so if accuracy of time-keeping is an issue, I would recommend one of those over an automatic, say a 2541.80 rather than the 2531.80, for example.
If however, you're objecting to paying that much money for the watch (not that you can't afford it, just that you object to it as a value for money issue) you might want to look at the
Casio MTD-1051A-2AVEF
[url] http://www.casio.co.uk/Products/Watches/Others/MTD-1051A-2AVEF/At%20a%20Glance[/url]
It looks very similar to a 2541.80, but will cost about a tenth of the price. (it also has a ten year battery)
Best of luck

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE