The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

It's Too Soon To Say... *LINK*
In Response To: Re: Can you backup your claim? ()

: I own a Rolex Submariner AND an Omega Seamaster
: 2220.80. Just giving my opinion-I knew I'd
: get this kind of reaction.

In your posts you obviously feel that Omega owners go out of their way to bash Rolex (see the link below to the thread in which you stated this). As I said in response to you, there are things I like and dislike about Rolex (and Omega for that matter), but I don't go out of my way to bash either brand, so your extreme generalizations are unfounded.

In your post above you stated:

"Nice to see Omega is making their own movements, but remember that Rolex is King, and Omega will always be a step behind no matter how many annoying Hollywood celebs they get to endorse their company."

I think this statement is premature to say the least. Omega's new in-house movement was only unveiled two days ago. Let's give the professional watchmakers time to evaluate it and compare it to Rolex's in-house movements. It may end up being superior, equal to, or inferior to a comparable Rolex movement. All I'm saying is that it is far too soon to judge a movement that is two days old.

If this movement turns out to be as promising as it looks, it is entirely possible that Omega will start to achieve more and more brand recognition and start to compete with Rolex on a much higher level. Granted, it's a high mountain for Omega to climb given Rolex's far superior level of brand recognition, but it is not impossible. I just want to wait and see what happens, and let the cards fall where they may.

-John

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE