The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.

: I completely fail to see the point about the
: phenomenal accuracy everyone seems to find
: in quartz watches. My wife has a quartz SMP
: and the damn thing gains like hell, 2.5
: seconds a week. According to Omega, this is
: within spec.

: Now here comes my comparison between mechanical
: and quartz. If a decently regulated
: mechanical watch with its gears and levers
: can keep time to within 30 seconds a month,
: then why can Omega quartz movements only
: operate within a specification of (0.4 x 30
: = ) 12 seconds per month? It's electronic,
: it's computer-engineered even (not unlike
: the mechanical calibers, I guess), and it
: still can't keep really accurate time. And
: no watchmaker seems to be able to regulate a
: quartz in his own workshop. Not particularly
: impressing, if you ask me.

: If you want accuracy, get a radio-controlled
: watch , which works with an external time
: reference and uses quartz only as the
: back-up in case there's no radio signal
: available.

: If you and your friends don't want to afford
: luxury-grade automatic watches (like Omega)
: and prefer to go for quartz in order to save
: a few quick bucks, that's fine for you, but
: stop bashing on mechanical movements. I'd
: rather go with a cheap automatic than with
: an expensive quartz, thank you very much.

: -hacmac

That's not exactly true. While the specs allow for a 12 second a month variance ,it would be difficult to find an Omega quartz movement that operates that badly. between my wife and I, we own quite a few watches. Some are as cheap as dirt. Some are relatively expensive. Some are quartz and 2 are automatic. My wife wears the exact same watch your wife wears and it only loses about 2 seconds a month, not 12. I have the automatic Seamaster Professional. After it received it's first servicing at an authorized Omega dealer, it only loses about a second a day. So her quartz version definitely keeps far better time and does not require me to reset it. If your wife's Omega SMP quartz is running fast by 2 seconds per day, it is the exception to the rul, not the rule itself.

Consequently, we travel outside the country a lot. I own a Citizen Worldtimer (Ecodrive) that I wear on the plane. It is quartz, solar powered, and keeps time in about 30 different cities worldwide simultaneously. I like it because all I need to do is touch a button and I get the correct time no matter where I am without reseting my watch. It costs about $250 a year ago. The quartz movement in that watch is at least as accurate as my wife's Omega Quartz that retails for around $1395.00.

I see your point with regards to servicing. I also sympathize with you for having purchased an Omega quartz that, while within specs, is not performing as it should reasonably be expected. It can be serviced, contrary to popular opinion. And yes, it can be adjusted as well. If your dealer cannot do it, I would check with another dealer. An authorized dealer who is concerned with customer satisfaction should understand your concerns and address them rather that simply push you out the door using the far end of the specs as a loophole. In summation, I do not feel that a better watch is in order. I feel that a better dealer/servicer is all that you need. Her watch can easily be adjusted to keep time within 1 second per week. As I said, my wife's SMP quartz did it straight out of the box. If your dealer cannot or is not willing to make the adjustment, there are other Omega dealers.

Messages In This Thread

Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
There is just something sexy about automatics that
Re: There is just something sexy about automatics
Re: There is just something sexy about automatics
I believe that text is from the Watchtime article
Well in response to that....
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Far out, man! This whole thread is too heavy. *NM*
HERE ARE THE ACTUAL PUBLISHED SPECIFICATIONS
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Yep, almost all watches are machine assembled... *LINK*
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
All Breitlings are COSC in last 2-3 years *NM*
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Breitling quartz is Chronometer certified
Re: Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Good one for posting the exact same thing...
Re: Good one for posting the exact same thing...
Point taken. nt *NM*
Re: Quartz "accuracy" = old wives' tales.
Nup, it's about that smooth seconds hand
The Fact That Automatic Owners Avoid
Rolex 'DOES' make a quartz movement! *NM*
The Fact That Some Quartz Owners Avoid
Re: The Fact That Some Quartz Owners Avoid
Re: The Fact That Automatic Owners Avoid
I just like to hear the ticking
A new twist! I'm disappointed an Omega owner >>>
Re: A new twist! I'm disappointed an Omega owner >
You missed completely...
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Quartz is logically superior, yes. So what?
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
I think you've missed the point alltogether
You "gave" the T-Touch away you..you...you...!!! *NM*
This is the difference *NM* *PIC*
Wow !!! - NICE BATTERY !! Made in Indonesia too !
Re: This is the difference
Nah, it's Timex *NM*
Re: Nah, it's Timex
Sorry, I don't own any Omega Quartz
Re: Sorry, I don't own any Omega Quartz
Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Dude, That's Heavy
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Re: Chronometer Chroshmometer - Quartz Is Superior
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE