The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

I am sure the "only" reason you

posted that review was because of its "factual" content, whatever makes you happy.

I wish that I could take a single review and deem it as "fact" in my mind, however I usually like to have substantiating evidence, or other reviews which illustrate the same findings. I urge you to find another review, either in print or on the web which comes to the same conclusions as Dr. Odets...if there is one out there then it is news to me, as I have tried and have yet to find anything even as remotely negative as he was.

Also, one must remember that Rolex no longer makes or sells the movement that is in the watch reviewed, and the new movement which is in its place has already been deemed of a much higher quality.

While I would love to be able to copy and paste reviews from watchtime on the internet, unfortunately they do not publish on the web and I do not have the free time to type out the entire review....

my suggestion to you would be that you go and order these backissues from watchtime and read up

June 2000 (SMP vs. Sub review)
Feb 2001 (New Daytona Review)
October 2002 (Day Date review)

you can also check out these internet links...

http://turfers.com/nuggets/posts/58.html

http://turfers.com/nuggets/posts/115.html

good luck

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE