The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

It's about intimacy *PIC*
In Response To: Re: Is that your question? ()

: "A crown is just a crown"..... While
: that is true, there's a lot more to it.

: A crown is the weakest part of the watch. It
: also gives you 'feedback' of a watch's
: quality. Cheap autos wind with noise.
: Winding an Omega is a pleasure, the feeback
: is butta smooth and quiet. You should try it
: yourself! After hearing a post about a crown
: actually falling off of a new Omega, and
: some posts about problems with setting the
: watch, I think that crown design (not just
: the metal top of course though) is
: important.....

As I read this I got to thinking about the winds I did on my 2254.50 Seamaster during the last 10 days of that 101-day precision accuracy test. I was very sensitive to the "feel" of it as I went along. I always held it near to my ear in an absolutely quiet room to listen for that clutch slip.

Wound the Rolex 14060M now twice, same focus.

Joey, it's not just butta, it's intimacy. At the risk of losing some folks here, it's probably the closest we'll get on a non-invasive basis to getting into our timepieces, routinely. I've always remembered one of the earliest Posts I exchanged here, noting the interdependance between watch and wearer. It stops w/out us (mechanical automatic, if we don't wear it, and other mechanicals if we fail to wind 'em). And we stop w/out it (given that it keeps us on time).

The more I think about this, the more I'm coming to grow in my affection.

Thanks for bringing this up!

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE